HASIL BELAJAR SEBAGAI OBJEK PENILAIAN

Authors

  • Achmad Rasyid Ridha Institut Islam Mambaul Ulum Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Nur Ali Rahmatullah Institut Islam Mambaul Ulum Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Aidatun Nisrina Nurul Firdaus Institut Islam Mambaul Ulum Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Yoga Wicaksono Institut Islam Mambaul Ulum Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Learning Outcomes, Cognitive Assessment, Affective Assessment, Psychomotor Assessment

Abstract

Assessment of learning outcomes is an important component in the educational process to measure learner performance in three main aspects, namely cognitive, affective and psychomotor. Cognitive aspects relate to intellectual skills such as knowledge, comprehension, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Cognitive assessment is usually done through written tests, oral exams, or tasks that require problem solving. Affective aspects include students' attitudes, values, interests, and motivations, which are assessed through observation, questionnaires, or self-reflection. Meanwhile, the psychomotor aspect includes physical skills and coordination of movement, which are assessed through hands-on practice, demonstrations, or performance-based projects. Integrating the assessment of these three domains ensures a holistic evaluation of the learner's development. This approach also helps educators identify students' strengths and weaknesses so that they can design more effective learning. The main challenges in assessing learning outcomes include the difficulty in objectively measuring affective and psychomotor aspects and the need for valid and reliable instruments. Therefore, educators need to combine different assessment methods, both quantitative and qualitative, to get an accurate picture of student learning. Thus, the assessment of learning outcomes focuses not only on the end result but also on the learning process itself. This research aims to discuss learning outcomes as an object of assessment. The method used in this research is a qualitative approach with the type of library research.

References

Afandi, M. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelejaran Sekolah Dasar. UNISSULA Press , 3.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Aqmarani, A. M. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran pada tingkat sekolah. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 57.

Asrul, A. H. (2022). EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN. Medan : Perdana Publishing.

Elvi Nur Lailatus Sa’adah dan Darsono Sigit, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap dan Keterampilan Psikomotorik pada Materi Elektrokimia,” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, danPengembangan 3, no. 8 (1 Agustus 2018), https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i8.11405

Fazilla, S. (2014). Pengembangan kemampuan afektif mahasiswa pgsd dengan menggunakan bahan ajar lembar kerja mahasiswa (lkm) dalam pembelajaran ipa di universitas almuslim. JUPENDAS (Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar), 1(2).

Hari Setiadi, Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013, Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 20, no. 2 (21 November 2016), https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173.

I Wayan Subagia dan I G. L. Wiratma, “Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia) 5, no. 1 (18 April 2016), https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293.

Marzuki, I., Sholihah, T., & Imansyah, F. A. (2023). Urgensi Aspek Penilaian Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Tadarus Tarbawy: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan, 5(1).

Mendikbud, P. (2007). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia . Jakarta: Balai Pustaka .

Mudjiono, D. d. (2006). belajar dan Pembelajaran . Jakarta: Rineka CIpta.

Mulyadi. (2010). Evaluasi Pendidikan Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama di Sekolah. UIN-Maliki Press, 3.

Musarwan, I. W. (2022). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Konsep. Fungsi dan Tujuan. Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Konsep. Fungsi dan Tujuan, 2.

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(2), 151-172.

Putra, R. P. (2024). OBJEK EVALUASI HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM ANALISIS TAKSONOMI BLOOM (KOGNITIF, AFEKTIF, PSIKOMOTORIK). Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 18-26.

Rahayu, S., & Pratiwi, D. (2021). Analisis Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.12345/jpi.v10i2.1234

Ratnawulan, E. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka .

Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dalam penelitian pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, 6(1), 41-53.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Syah, M. (2011). Psikologi Belajar . Jakata : Bumi Aksara.

Widodo, S., & Katminingsih, Y. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Kompetensi Dasar Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Matematika Wajib Kelas X SMA/MA Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Anderson. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 204-214.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-20